Hannah arendt on violence essay

In more recent years, Arendt has received further criticism from authors Bettina Stangneth and Deborah Lipstadt . Stangneth argues in her work, Eichmann Before Jerusalem , that Eichmann was, in fact, an insidious antisemite. [21] She utilized the Sassen Papers and accounts of Eichmann while in Argentina to prove that he was proud of his position as a powerful Nazi and the murders that this allowed him to commit. While she acknowledges that the Sassen Papers were not disclosed in the lifetime of Arendt, she argues that the evidence was there at the trial to prove that Eichmann was an antisemitic murderer and that Arendt simply ignored this. [22] Deborah Lipstadt contends in her work, The Eichmann Trial , that Arendt was distracted by her own views of totalitarianism to objectively judge Eichmann. [18] She refers to Arendt's own work on totalitarianism, The Origins of Totalitarianism , as a basis for Arendt's seeking to validate her own work by using Eichmann as an example. [18] Lipstadt further contends that Arendt "wanted the trial to explicate how these societies succeeded in getting others to do their atrocious biddings" and so framed her analysis in a way which would agree with this pursuit. [18] These authors have continued the modern day notions that Arendt was wrong and irresponsible in her application of the banality of evil to Adolf Eichmann.

From the 1960s into the 21st Century, The New York Review of Books has posed the questions in the debate on American life, culture, and politics. It is the journal where Mary McCarthy reported on the Vietnam War from Saigon and Hanoi; Edmund Wilson challenged Vladimir Nabokov’s translations ; Hannah Arendt published her reflections on violence ; Ralph Nader published his “manifesto” for consumer justice ; . Stone investigated the lies of Watergate; Susan Sontag challenged the claims of modern photography ; Jean-Paul Sartre, at 70, described his writing and politics , and how he felt about his blindness; Elizabeth Hardwick addressed the issues of women and writing; Gore Vidal hilariously lampooned bestsellers, Howard Hughes, Teddy Roosevelt, and the Reagans ; Felix Rohatyn made the case for a national industrial policy in an influential series of articles; Peter G. Peterson showed why the present Social Security program can’t last ; Joan Didion described, in a firsthand account, the situation in El Salvador ; McGeorge Bundy, George Kennan, and Lewis Thomas outlined the nuclear threat; Nadine Gordimer and Bishop Desmond Tutu wrote from South Africa on the conflict over apartheid; Vaclav Havel published his reflections from the Czech underground; Timothy Garton Ash reported on the new Eastern Europe ; Mark Danner reported on torture from the CIA black sites ; Ronald Dworkin wrote of how George W. Bush’s two Supreme Court appointees have created an unbreakable phalanx bent on remaking constitutional law; Freeman Dyson described the scientist as rebel ; David Cole revealed how the Bush Justice Department allowed America to become a nation that disappeared and tortured suspects ; articles by Paul Krugman, George Soros, Joseph Stiglitz, and Jeff Madrick explained America’s failing economy; Tom Powers described the George W. Bush administration’s fundamental shift from diplomacy to military action ; Martin Filler wrote on the many makers of modern architecture; and where Bill Moyers described the threat to the environment presented by Evangelical Christians . It is the journal where the most important issues are discussed by writers who are themselves a major force in world literature and thought.

Hannah arendt on violence essay

hannah arendt on violence essay


hannah arendt on violence essayhannah arendt on violence essayhannah arendt on violence essayhannah arendt on violence essay